'What was India like?' I was asked
on my return from nine monsoon-flooded weeks travelling and
researching there. The simple answer is, that there is no simple
answer. India is a country of contradictions, from the Mumbai
(Bombay) skyscrapers in the West to fertile Orissa and Bengal in the
East. From the serenity of Kerala in the South to the war torn
battered Jammu & Kashmir in the North. India is a melting pot
incorporating many religions, ethnicities and languages. It
encapsulates incredible wealth and grinding poverty, hope and
despair. This is India!
India is described variously as third world,
underdeveloped, or developing, and in many respects these labels have
a semblance of truth. The government of India wants the country to
catch up with the 'developed' Western world. But it is not a one-way
process; in fact I would argue that we in the West have a lot to learn
from India. This is particularly the case in terms of women's
empowerment which is the subject of our research, 'Women, empowerment
and Indian local governance'.
In 1992 the Indian government brought in an
amendment to the Indian constitution (the 73rd), which established a
system of reservation on the panchayats (local councils). The
amendment reserved not less than one third of all seats in the
panchayats for women and the same for those from scheduled castes. It
also allowed for reservation for the seats of chair of these
councils. This was a groundbreaking step for a country steeped in a
deep-rooted patriarchal political system. It was a first: finally
women who make up over 50% of the Indian population could have a
significant voice and influence on the policy agenda. Women's voices
would be heard, by a country whose patriarchal ears had been closed to
their needs since the foundation of India on 11August 1947. It was a
dramatic step forward in a country where dowry deaths and mutilations
are common. At the same time other changes were taking place, the
Indian government created a new three-tier system of local governance,
the 'Panchayati Raj', which would place power and finance at the
village level, thus bypassing a traditionally corrupt bureaucracy and
placing resources at the disposal of those who really understood the
priorities of their own locality. This was the theory but the
practice was often very different.
In certain areas of the country there have been
successes, for instance the Southern state of Kerala with its
excellent literacy, peacefully integrated population and relative
wealth has seen tremendous participation and a marked difference in
the approach and responsiveness of its local governing bodies. But
Kerala has traditionally been on the left and open to new ideas. In
fact Kerala was the first place in the world to have a democratically
elected communist government. But the successes of states such as
Kerala and Tamil Nadu in implementing the new legislation and ensuring
fair practice have been marred by failures in many other areas across
India. Bihar and Jharkhand in Northern India are troubled, lawless
and anarchic states demonstrated by the fact that only 2 months ago,
over 9 years after the 73rd amendment was introduced, the first
elections were held using the new system of reservation.
The elections that were held were rife with
corruption, wealthy local landowners literally and without opposition
bought votes with just a few rupees. There were many cases of violence
and intimidation, of polling-station brawls and the occasional
political murder. Nevertheless reservation is in place and women do
now make up one third of the members of the panchayats. This would
appear a success for women but the reality is far less clear. In many
instances the previous male office-holders put their wives names on
the forms and campaigned as usual and now the elected female
councillors stay at home and their husbands go to the council meetings
in their place. On paper a success but in practice there is only more
deception and corruption. Even in situations where women have
benefited from this amendment, become democratically elected
councillors and taken their seats their problems are only just
beginning. Due to centuries of patriarchy, perpetuated by the British
Raj and post-partition India, the illiteracy rate among women is far
higher than men. Women have traditionally stayed at home, taking care
of their families and homes with the occasional remittance of heavy
agricultural labour. When these women make it to their local
panchayat they are at a great disadvantage, their male colleagues know
the system, understand the terminology and are literate. Many newly
elected female councillors feel lost and bemused by their sudden
entrance to this male-dominated world. Despite the reservation system
being a tremendous step forward, they have to fight their own lack of
education and awareness, the corrupt bureaucracy, patriarchal
attitudes of their men-folk and society, all of this to take their
rightful place beside men at the levers of local power.
Despite the obstacles Indian women have huge
strides in the last few years, in the majority of states at least on
paper women now make up one third of local representatives. Compare
this to your local council or even Westminster and think how far we in
the "developed" West have to go. Positive discrimination can provide a
voice for the disenfranchised millions and the system of reservation
provides an opportunity that we cannot afford to ignore.